Define a new ‘multiplication’ operation on , by setting . Is a ring according to Definition 3.1? (Prove it is, or explain why it is not).
Answer
Yes, it is a ring. The properties of addition follows from . First, we will prove that the multiplication is associative. Let . Then,
Next, we will prove that distributivity holds.
Lastly, we will prove that the multiplicative identity exists. Choose as the identity. Let . Then,
Thus, is a ring.